# Docket 25-055-P — The Final-Order Tranche (Docs 74–84): Order No. 9, the Rehearing Round, and Order No. 11 The decision record of the Google / [[Altitude Capital, LLC]] Special Rate Contract docket — **retrieved 2026-06-11, closing a major currency gap**: the wiki's 2026-05-22 docket capture was truncated at the supplemental-testimony round, and every subsequent pass diffed against that truncated capture, so the wiki carried the CIAC classification ([[T001 - CIAC Classification of Google Generation Payments|T001]]) as "pending" when in fact **REDACTED Order No. 9 issued 2025-12-04** — before the FOIA campaign began. Eight documents: Order No. 9 (Doc. 74), EAL's Petition for Rehearing or Clarification (Doc. 76, 2025-12-31), Order No. 10 + the response round (Docs 77/78/80/81), **Order No. 11** (Doc. 83, 2026-01-29), and the Elbe Compliance Testimony (Doc. 84, 2026-02-05). SHA-256 inventory at `_phase0_workdir/inventory_2026-06-11_25-055-p.txt`. ## What's inside - `25-055-P_74_1.pdf` (80 pp.) — REDACTED ORDER NO. 9 (Commission), 2025-12-04 — see [[Google SRC Order No. 9 Final Approval and CIAC Ruling]] - `25-055-P_76_1.pdf` (19 pp.) — EAL Petition for Rehearing or Clarification, 2025-12-31 - `25-055-P_77_1.pdf` (4 pp.) — Order No. 10 (questions to EAL), 2026-01-07 - `25-055-P_78_1.pdf` (11 pp.) — EAL REDACTED Response Pleading, 2026-01-08 - `25-055-P_80_1.pdf` (5 pp.) — Staff Response to the Petition, 2026-01-12 - `25-055-P_81_1.pdf` (8 pp.) — EAL REDACTED Reply, 2026-01-20 - `25-055-P_83_1.pdf` (11 pp.) — ORDER NO. 11 (Commission), 2026-01-29 — see [[Google SRC Order No. 11 Rehearing Ruling]] - `25-055-P_84_1.pdf` (9 pp.) — Elbe Compliance Testimony with HSPI Revised Exhibits CKE-3/CKE-4, 2026-02-05 ## Key takeaways 1. **The SRC is approved.** "[T]he Commission approves, without modification, the Agreement filed as EAL's Exhibit A ... as being consistent with the public interest" — the RIM tests, including the Commission-ordered MBSA sensitivities, "show positive results (1.0 or above)" (`25-055-P_74_1.pdf`, pp. 72–73). 2. **EAL's payment-treatment is rejected.** "[T]he Commission denies EAL's requested ratemaking treatment ... as it does not comply with Ark. Code Ann. § 23-4-1304(x)(2)(A) or (x)(2)(B)" (p. 73); "the purposes of treating these contributions as 'another form of payment' is to benefit EAL and Google, not EAL's other customers ... customers would benefit from having these contributions treated as a CIAC" (p. 76). 3. **The remedy: CIAC or a life-of-asset schedule.** EAL ordered to file within 30 days a treatment "that treats the payments as CIAC or proposes an amortization schedule that complies with Ark. Code Ann. § 23-4-1304(x)(2)(B)" (p. 77). On rehearing, **Order No. 11 denied EAL's shorter schedule "in favor of a schedule that is consistent with the life of the Cypress Solar assets"** (`25-055-P_83_1.pdf`, p. 6) — and the 2026-02-05 compliance filing revised Exhibits CKE-3/CKE-4 accordingly (the revised schedules are HSPI-sealed). 4. **The ITC treatment is granted — under protest, non-precedentially.** Order No. 11: the deal "was presented as a fait accompli"; the Commission grants EAL's requested ITC treatment "given the unique nature of the Agreement," while directing that "the Company shall not contract away ratemaking treatments that are clearly within the province of the Commission" and that the grant "is not – and should not – be treated as precedential" (pp. 7–8). 5. **The cumulative-impact statement.** Order No. 11 §C records the Commission's "ongoing and significant concerns with the cumulative and increasing ratepayer impact" of the new-generation program, citing the five-year cumulative rate-change exhibit (MSK-2, Docket 25-049-TF) and EAL's intent to study gas repowering of White Bluff (pp. 8–9). ## People and orgs mentioned [[Doyle Webb]], [[Justin Tate]], [[Katie Anderson]] (Commission); [[Crystal K. Elbe]], [[David E. Hunt]], [[Kristin Dalrymple]], [[J. David Palmer]] (EAL witnesses); [[Regina L. Butler]] (Staff); [[Entergy Arkansas]], [[Google LLC]] / [[Altitude Capital, LLC]], [[APSC General Staff]], [[Office of the Arkansas Attorney General]]. ## Concepts invoked [[Special rate contract]] · [[Generating Arkansas Jobs Act (GAJA) rider]] · [[Arkansas Cypress]] · [[Strategic Investment]] ## Events documented - [[2025-12 APSC Approves the Google SRC and Rejects the Payment Treatment]] - [[2026-01 Order No. 11 Forces Life-of-Asset Amortization of the Google Payments]] ## Cross-references - **Resolves [[T001 - CIAC Classification of Google Generation Payments]]** (`resolved-via-Order-No-9-and-Order-No-11`) — see the tension page for the precise split disposition. - [[Who Pays for Entergy's New Generation]] — Sections IV–VI and the Status block updated; see its §X. - [[D001 Synthesis]] — the dialectic ran 2026-05-24 on a "final-order-pending" premise that was already false; a currency-correction note is recorded there. ## Open questions / follow-ups - The HSPI Order No. 9 (Doc. 75) and the revised CKE-3/CKE-4 exhibits remain sealed — the actual contribution amounts and amortization schedules are still non-public. - Whether any party sought judicial review of Order No. 11 (none observed on the docket as of 2026-06-11). - Root-cause hygiene: docket re-captures must page to the end of the filing list; the 2026-05-22 capture truncation propagated through three subsequent passes.