# Dalrymple Direct Testimony on the Google SRC Kristin Dalrymple's 20-page direct testimony as Vice President of Business Operations and Strategy at [[Entergy Arkansas]], filed 2025-09-05 in [[psc/docket-25-055-p-special-contract-2026-05-22/_overview|Docket 25-055-P]]. **The sponsor of the key terms of the [[Altitude Capital, LLC|Altitude Capital]] Special Rate Contract**, including the termination-fee provision (sealed) and the customer-specific arrangements. Most substantive content is sealed in the HSPI version (Doc. 22). ## Role in T001 dialectics Dalrymple's testimony was surfaced by [[D001 Antithesis]] as load-bearing evidence on the CIAC vs. "other form of payment" classification question in [[T001 - CIAC Classification of Google Generation Payments|T001]]. Specifically, p. 12 characterizes the transmission CIAC payments as made "in advance of EAL's provision of service to Google" — using the **identical "financially support the development" framing** that Hunt's testimony uses to label the generation payments as not-CIAC. This parallelism between Dalrymple's (transmission/CIAC) and Hunt's (generation/non-CIAC) characterizations was central to D001 Antithesis's argument that EAL's accounting asymmetry does not track any visible statutory distinction in § 23-4-1304(x)(2)(A). The dialectical record per [[D001 Synthesis]]: this parallelism finding is preserved in [[Who Pays for Entergy's New Generation]] Section IV under the `### The parallelism problem — surfaced by [[D001 Antithesis]]` subsection. The substantive content of Dalrymple's testimony beyond p. 12 — particularly the termination-fee provision and customer-specific arrangements — is HSPI-sealed in Doc. 22; this public version is correspondingly thin. A future ingest pass could expand the source-page content with additional verbatim quotations from the public portions. ## Cross-references See the [[psc/docket-25-055-p-special-contract-2026-05-22/_overview|Docket 25-055-P production overview]] for context.