# Synthesis Synthesis pages are cross-cutting narrative essays that pull together what the corpus shows on a specific question. They are **navigation artifacts**, not primary evidence — every claim on a synthesis page traces back to a raw source document in `raw/` or `web archive/` per the citation rules in [`AGENTS.md`](../../AGENTS.md). Each page carries a `confidence:` flag in its frontmatter indicating how well-anchored the synthesis is. ## Pages - **[[Who Pays for Entergy's New Generation]]** — *confidence: medium*. The load-bearing synthesis on cost allocation across seven APSC dockets (26-001-U, 26-008-TF, 24-072-U, 25-047-U, 25-054-U, 25-055-P, 23-025-P, 22-032-TF). Central finding: all 738,836 retail customers pay the full GAJA Rider ($110.4M/year); Google / Altitude Capital's offsetting payments are sealed; the Commission is questioning the CIAC classification. - **[[The Conway Data Center Project]]** — *confidence: low*. The [[Forgelight Ventures, LLC]] "Project Stratus" project in Faulkner County — ~1-GW design on the 160-acre Adams Property (Lollie Rd); 65% / 30-year property-tax abatement via industrial-revenue bond; cooling water from Tupelo Bayou WWTP treated effluent. Now anchored by both Tier-1 productions (City 2026-05-26 land-use; Conway Corporation 2026-05-29 utility/engineering). Confidence is low per [[D003 Synthesis]] **because the developer principal is unidentified** — the wiki applies its restraint standard and does not name a "leading candidate"; the [[Spark Innovations, LLC]] → confirmed-Google West Memphis name coincidence is a high-priority lead, not an identification. - **[[The Port of Little Rock Data Center]]** — *confidence: medium*. The [[Willowbend Capital, LLC]] project ("Project Boar") in Pulaski County — twin Delaware shell to [[Forgelight Ventures, LLC|Forgelight]]; ~300,000 SF, ~$1B, ~50 jobs; same 65% / 30-year abatement structure; [[Google LLC|Google]] reported as principal. Little Rock Board approved MOU 2025-04-29. - **[[Pulaski County's Attempt to Regulate Data Centers]]** — *confidence: medium*. How Pulaski County has (not) regulated data centers: [[AVAIO Digital Partners|AVAIO Project Leo]] cleared an un-zoned county through administrative site-plan review alone; the Quorum Court's first moratorium (emergency ordinance 26-I-37A) failed the 10-vote threshold and drew a County-Attorney preemption objection under the Arkansas Data Centers Act; the surviving track is a 90-day Planning-Board zoning referral; the County Judge added a 30-day intake pause. Tier-1 spine (the AVAIO planning file + the #26-341 moratorium production) with two Tier-3 dependencies. - **[[Identifying the Unnamed Cooling-Water Data Centers]]** — *confidence: low*. Attempt to identify two unnamed data-center cooling-water projects surfaced in the Arkansas Department of Agriculture's water-records production (the "Arup project" — confidential groundwater inquiry; and the "McClelland Consulting Engineers project" — 4.32 MGD Sparta Aquifer draw). Both remain unidentified from the public record; the page documents the open question rather than asserting a finding. - **[[Documentary Minimization in the Arkansas Data-Center Record]]** — *confidence: medium*. The cross-cutting pattern by which the public record is engineered thin across all six sites — NDAs binding public-side participants, deliberate non-creation of records, shell developers, trade-secret/competitive designations, blanket statutory exemptions, and APSC sealing — and what it implies for the investigation's highest-value remaining targets. ## See also - [`PLAN.md`](../../PLAN.md) — phase plan and investigation framing. - [`HANDOFF.md`](../../HANDOFF.md) — running session log and carryover tasks. - [[About This Wiki]] · [[How to Read This Wiki]]